Meeting
Minutes – TWG Meeting May 2, 2007
IDWR Office – Boise, ID
In
Attendance –
Louis
Wasniewski, Caribou-Targhee NF
Leigh Bailey, Payette NF
Jerry Korol, NRCS
Scott Van Hoff, USGS (Hydro Discussion)
Michael Ciscell, IDWR (Hydro Discussion)
Karl Gebhardt, BLM (Watershed discussion)
Michele Porter, BLM (Watershed discussion)
Steve Garcia, USGS
Linda Davis, IDWR
Sandra Thiel, IDWR
Genna Ashley, IDWR
No
Phone Attendees
The
meeting began at approximately 9:00 a.m.
HYDROGRAPHY MEETING
The MOU between IDWR and USGS will be signed soon,
making IDWR the official state data steward.
This means that all changes will come through IDWR before being sent to
NHD. Geometry edits involve
changing 16 fields in four tables and Sandra Thiel with IDWR has worked
extensively with NHD and learned the complicated update process involved in
order to successfully submit changes. There
are some streams within Idaho that need to be changed (geometric edits), and
there was much discussion on how to approach this as a state.
Geometric edits are very cumbersome and time consuming to complete right
now. USGS does not plan to switch
to ESRI version 9.2 until at least September, and work continues on editing
tools to make them work with SDE. For
the time being, most updates have been name changes, with geometric changes
coming later when the tools have been developed and tested.
Louis Wasniewski stated that there is currently an
effort within Caribou-Targhee National Forest to update streams within their
forest boundary. He asked if
approval would be needed to make these edits.
Sandra Thiel stated that IDWR does not have an approval process, but a
system in place to check the edits into the NHD, making sure they will
successfully get through the 15 table edits that must take place to
submit a change. Sandra stated that
she would like to get all edits that agencies can submit, particularly in areas
where local knowledge is present. Leigh
Bailey stated that the Payette National Forest has many, many streams that could
be submitted, but she would have reservations about the accuracy of the data,
unless it has been GPS or field-checked. Many
of the streams were drawn on maps and scanned, etc.
There was much discussion about resolution and scale, and what other
states were doing. The NHD data has
been collected at various scales throughout the country; some areas have even
collected data at 1:2400. Sandra
Thiel stated that the decision has been made to take all data at all
scales and incorporate it into the NHD. There
has been some discussion in the past about adding a “scale” field, but it
has not been discussed lately. Sandra
is participating in weekly phone conference calls with NHD, and will ask about
this issue during the next meeting. New
edit tools should be released near the end of May.
This tool should make it easier to import geometry, which will help with
the edits that have been submitted. Sandra
Thiel stated that there have been a few missing perennial streams, and literally
thousands of missing intermittent streams.
It was discussed how to handle density issues, or “patchwork blocks”
when many lines are submitted and included for a particular area.
It was decided that it is better to have some data in these areas,
rather than no data at all. Al Rea continues to work on his data model and that will help
with some of the intermittent vs. perennial issues, but the land managers should
have final say, because they are on the ground and continually verifying their
data. It is good to submit the data
if there is ever a question that it may be needed in the NHD at some time in the
future, and it should be submitted as it is collected.
Louis Wasniewski stated that this would be a good
time for the Forest Service Regional Hydrologist, Rick Hopson, to be involved
with NHD so that money could be earmarked for these updates.
All forests are using NHD to some degree, and that will increase as more
data links are switched over.
Sandra Thiel stated that NHD would be taking their
server down sometime in June for a complete replacement.
This upgrade should last a couple of weeks.
They will continue with version 9.1 (ESRI), and expect to upgrade to 9.2
sometime in September.
IDWR has applied for the EPA National Environmental
Information Exchange Network Grant (NEIEN) in October, and the results will be
announced in July or August. This
grant would allow IDWR to give NHD changes to the National Dataset, and updates
back to IDWR. Minnesota has the
same system in place, with updates approximately 3-times per week.
Their system does the updates at approximately 2:30 a.m. each morning.
The Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has also given support for
this effort.
There is no permanent/unique feature ID system in
place for NHD at this time. The
Com-ID is unique, but not persistent, while the Reach-code is persistent, but
not unique. There may be an
additional “GUID” field so that everything can be tracked. In addition, an “Events” feature will replace the
“Landmark” feature.
Scott Van Hoff is the new USGS Liaison.
He replaces Tracy Fuller, who has moved to Denver.
The NHD group has asked for a list server to be
available for networking services such as posts, shared tools, etc.
No word yet when this will be available in the future.
There will not be any new GNIS names in Wilderness
areas. If there is a name that is
not listed, misspelled, or not used anymore, it will remain that way.
There is no plan to update or add any new names if it falls within a
specified Wilderness area.
The Hydrography Meeting concluded at approximately
10:30 a.m.
WATERSHED
MEETING
Louis
Wasniewski, Forest Hydrologist from the Caribou-Targhee National Forest reviewed
the following hucs with the group:
Birch Creek – 17040216:
·
The 5th
fields “Mud Creek” and “Upper Birch Creek” will be combined and called
“Upper Birch Creek”. The local
name for “Upper Birch Creek” is in the Kaufman Guard Station area, and
calling the uppermost 5th field (old “Mud Creek” name) would not
make sense to those in the area. Also,
calling this area “Headwaters” of Birch Creek would not work, because most
of this area is comprised of intermittent streams that only flow in high water
years.
·
The 6th
field name “Birch Creek Headwaters” will be renamed “Birch Creek-Spring
Mountain Canyon”. The headwaters
in this area are intermittent at best, and not considered the headwaters of
Birch Creek to those in the area.
·
The 6th
field name “Birch Creek-Irish Canyon” will be renamed “Birch Creek-Scott
Canyon”. Scott Canyon is the
predominant feature.
·
Rocky
Canyon will be broken out as a pure 6th field unit, named “Rocky
Canyon”. The remaining composite
area that was originally “Birch Creek-Rocky Canyon” will be combined with
the 6th field originally named “Timber Canyon”, and renamed Birch
Creek-Mahogany Canyon”.
·
“Birch
Creek-Goddard Canyon” will be renamed “Birch Creek-Skull Canyon”
·
“Birch
Creek-Surrett Canyon will be renamed “Birch Creek Bartel Canyon”
·
There is
a small area of the 4th field line between the 6th fields
“Birch Creek-Skull Canyon (new name, and the 6th field “Bare
Canyon” in huc 17040215 that crosses hydro.
Genna
Ashley will make these changes and send them to Louis Wasniewski.
In addition, these changes will be sent to Karen Hanson, USGS in Utah so
they can be incorporated into their dataset.
Medicine Lodge – 17040215:
·
Per local
knowledge, Horse Creek should go with Divide Creek/Warm Creek, so the 6th
field line should be moved to that confluence.
·
“Warm
Creek” 6th field will be renamed “Divide Creek”
·
The
“Middle Creek” 6th field will be split into two 6th’s
– “Upper Middle Creek” and “Lower Middle Creek”
·
The
“Indian Creek” 6th field will be split into two 6th’s
– “Upper Indian Creek” and “Lower Indian Creek”.
·
The 6th
field name “Buckhorn Canyon” should be renamed “Nicholia Creek”
Genna
Ashley will make these changes and send them to Louis Wasniewski.
In addition, these changes will be sent to Karen Hanson, USGS in Utah so
they can be incorporated into their dataset.
Beaver-Camas – 17040214:
·
“Rattlesnake
Creek” 6th field will be split into two 6th’s –
“Rattlesnake Creek” (Upper portion), and “Rattlesnake Creek-Threemile
Creek” (Lower portion).
·
The 6th
field “West Camas Creek” confluence will be moved further south, per local
knowledge.
Genna
Ashley will make these changes and send them to Louis Wasniewski.
In addition, these changes will be sent to Karen Hanson, USGS in Utah so
they can be incorporated into their dataset.
American Falls 17040206:
Karl
Gebhardt and Michele Porter joined the meeting for this discussion.
BLM had previously delineated new 6th field lines that went
around the lava fields in this huc, rather than try to delineate the high
points, treating this area as a closed basin, or karst area.
After some discussion, it was concluded that since Karen Hanson had
previously taken time to delineate through these areas, and other surrounding
states (CA, NM, UT, NV, and OR) had also delineated through the lava, Idaho
would keep the original linework delineating the lava.
A contract already exists between BLM and USGS-Utah for Karen Hanson to
do the work, and Karen is familiar with these types of delineations.
It was noted that IDWR will be sure to document the justification for
delineating the lava, and note how the standards were applied in the metadata.
Hoodoo Creek – The Hoodoo Creek area in 6th field huc 170102140602
where the line is crossing hydro was reviewed.
After much discussion, Leigh Bailey will contact a hydrologist with the
Idaho Panhandle National Forest (Rick Patten has retired), and see if she can
get additional information. There
was further confusion around Kelso Lake, Round Lake and Granite Lake regarding
which way the hydro was flowing in/out, and hopefully someone with local
knowledge with the forest can help to sort this area out.
Genna Ashley will send Leigh Bailey the jpg images that were used in the
meeting so she can forward them to the appropriate person at Idaho Panhandle
National Forest.
Chatcolet Lake/Coeur d’Alene Lake/Round Lake: There was a question from Kimberly Jones (Karen Hanson-USGS)
e-mailed on 2/12/07 asking about the break between Chatcolet Lake, Coeur
d’Alene Lake and Round Lakes. The
current break is from St. Joe Point across the lake to the gap.
Looking at the DRG draped over 2005 NAIP, they were wondering if it
should be moved to the south. These
lakes all appear to be interconnected, so there was confusion about where the
exact break was. After some
discussion, the group decided to send this documentation to Idaho Panhandle
National Forest for direction. At
the time this huc was originally delineated for concept lines, the Idaho TWG was
not aware that a 4th field boundary line could be changed at all, so
this issue was not explored.
Cheatback Canyon: After
reviewing where the pour point would be for Cheatback basin, it was determined
to drain into Middle Cheatback Basin, with the pour point being in section 12.
Therefore, the 4th field boundary line will be moved east to
the next ridge (along the same line as the IDWR administrative basin boundary).
Genna Ashley will make this change and send the lines to the appropriate
entities (USGS Idaho and Utah).
4th field boundary line question #1: There was a question regarding the Warren Creek
(170602070901) 6th field huc at the southern-most tip, which is also
the 4th field boundary line. The
Nez Perce boundary line crossed through the lake depression.
Leigh Bailey stated that she had previously worked this out with the Nez
Perce National Forest, and the boundary line should remain as-is (not crossing
the lake). IDWR will keep the
current delineation and not incorporate what was submitted from the Nez Perce
National Forest for this line.
4th field boundary line question #2: During a phone (WEBEX) meeting in March, a question was asked
by Karen Hanson regarding a portion of the 4th field boundary line
between hucs 17050201 and 17050124. After
some review, the group determined that this line should be moved per Karen’s
recommendation. Genna Ashley will
incorporate this line into the Master Draft Watershed dataset and notify Karen
Hanson of the change.
MISCELLANEOUS
DISCUSSION
Genna
Ashley has received preliminary linework and attributes from USGS in Utah for
the Idaho/Oregon border hucs and also the Bear Lake area.
This linework is preliminary, and no incorporation will be done until the
final linework has been completed. There
are some major differences on the Idaho portion of hucs 17060101 (Hells Canyon)
and 17050201 (Brownlee). Genna
Ashley will send Leigh Bailey the shapefiles of these areas so she can go
through and look at the proposed changes. After
Leigh has had a chance to review the differences, this will be put on the next
meeting agenda to discuss.
ACTION
ITEMS:
Genna Ashley will make the changes for the Birch Creek, Medicine
Lodge and Beaver-Camas hucs that were discussed during this meeting.
She will send the completed changes to Louis Wasniewski (Caribou-Targhee
NF) and also to Karen Hanson (USGS-Utah).
Genna Ashley will report to Karen Hanson the group’s decision
regarding the Lava area in the American Falls huc. The 6th fields will be delineated, per Karen’s
direction, and the metadata will be documented.
Leigh Bailey will contact the Idaho Panhandle National Forest
regarding the Hoodoo Creek and Chatcolet Lake issues identified above.
Both of these areas will be put on the July agenda for further review.
Genna Ashley will send the following data to Leigh Bailey:
.jpg images of Hoodoo Creek, Chatcolet Lake, and the new linework
received from Karen Hanson in the Brownlee and Hells Canyon hucs.
Genna Ashley will make the 4th field edits to
areas outlined above (Cheatback Canyon and 17050201/17050124).
This linework will be sent to Steve Garcia and Karen Hanson.
NEXT
SCHEDULED TWG MEETING (S):
Friday,
July 20, 2007
- at the
Idaho Department of Water Resources in Boise, ID.
The meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m.
For directions and/or NetMeeting connections, please contact Genna Ashley at (208) 287-4880 genna.ashley@idwr.idaho.gov
***Subject
to change before meeting***
The
meeting concluded at approximately 4:00 p.m.